Insolvency
Creditors

Creditors’ meeting in insolvency: review convening and voting rights

Review an insolvency creditors’ meeting: convening, announced agenda, voting rights and court control under sections 91 to 95 IO.

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Your insolvency law team

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte

Insolvency law, Salzburg and throughout Austria

We review the procedural status, contracts, payment records and security, then explain which legal question needs to be addressed next.

5 September 2026, Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt

A creditors’ meeting is not a general discussion of the proceeding. The insolvency court convenes and chairs it; the announced subject and agenda determine which resolutions can be adopted.

Under section 92 IO, votes are generally counted among the insolvency creditors who attend and according to the amount of their claims. Section 93 contains specific rules for established, unexamined, disputed, conditional and secured claims.

This article follows the meeting from convening to possible court cancellation of a resolution and does not replace review of the actual notice.

Creditors’ meeting in insolvency: review convening and voting rights

Which documents answer which question?

Keep the legal basis, evidence and next action together.

Creditors’ meeting in insolvency: review convening and voting rights
Proceedings Orders, edict and case reference Which stage is documented?
Claim or position Contract, records and payments What exactly is at issue?
Next step Application, vote or court decision What must happen next?

The actual file and current procedural stage remain decisive.

Creditors’ meeting in insolvency: review convening and voting rights

Is the file ready for the next decision?

Separate source, position and concrete action.

Discuss the specific matter with the firm.

01 Question 1

Are the decisive documents complete?

Your answers

Review the documents

01

Prepare the file for the next action

Put the order, source, evidence and responsibility into a short chronology.

02

Obtain the missing documents

Do not assume a deadline or effect until the missing document and its date are clear.

03

Review the dispute separately

Separate undisputed facts, disputed legal questions and the concrete court or out-of-court step.

Legal basis and procedural stage

Under section 92 IO, votes are generally counted among the insolvency creditors who attend and according to the amount of their claims. Section 93 contains specific rules for established, unexamined, disputed, conditional and secured claims.

This article follows the meeting from convening to possible court cancellation of a resolution and does not replace review of the actual notice.

Keep the evidence chronological

Match orders, agreements, performance, payments and communications by date and legal basis.

Do not derive a legal effect from a heading, invoice or informal assurance alone.

Document the next concrete step

Record which declaration, vote, court decision or further review is actually pending.

Do not assume a general deadline or automatic effect while the file is incomplete.

Do not assume a blanket effect: Review the procedural stage, source, documents and next step separately.
FAQ

Common questions about the topic

Which source controls? +

The current RIS text and the actual court order. A general guide does not replace the file.

Is an invoice or email enough? +

No. Basis, period, evidence and procedural connection must fit together.

Is there an automatic deadline? +

A deadline must be taken from the applicable rule and actual order.

What should be secured first? +

The case reference, orders, evidence, delivery records and the concrete open decision.

Topics
Creditors’ meetingVoting rightsInsolvency creditorsResolutions

Would you like us to review a claim, owned goods or a decision in a business crisis?

Tell us your role, the business concerned and the procedural status. We respond within one business day.

Direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg